Thanks for the tip,
buzbard ! That seems like both a lengthy and non-intuitive approach, but I sure am willing to try!
Oh wait... from the root folder (in Windows Explorer... and not Internet Explorer), when... OK, never mind, I see what you mean... wow that really is bit archaic to get to...
Okay, I set it to include file contents too... hopefully this works...
From what I've "learned" today, so far (ha!), is that "Folder Options" also controls "Search"... well that it is quite a stretch of my limited imagination, but okay....
I also learned the "Search" tab of "Folder Options" includes nifty options "Include system directories" and "Include compressed files (ZIP, CAB...)"
Anyway, with these new / "correct" settings I once again tried searching my folder for files containing "_FILE"
The result is a list of over 2100 items! The first dozen (or so) items are directories (I definitely ain't gonna search through all that crap). The remainder are actual files... following is a list of the top ten (or so) files:
announce.txt
clock.s
time.h
interrupt.s
6502.h
posixdirent.s
dirent.h
global.c
version.c
codeseg.c
expr.c
(if you wonder about strange order, it is sorted by "date modified")
The
most important thing, in all of those files, is the fact that the text "_FILE" was found
zero times! Not at all!!!!!!!!!!!!
And I hope you understand when I say that I don't have the patience to examine the remaining 2090 files!
In summary, Microsoft Search is
royally forked-up. (Or maybe this PC is FUBAR?)
I thought *maybe* due to the leading underscore ("_FILE" ... as opposed to "FILE") this *might* have something to do with Regular Expressions ??
Well I double-checked the Folder/Search options (thanks again,
buzbard )... I did *not* have the option "natural language search" enabled, and unless I am missing something, there
is no option for "Regular Expression" matching...
Did I discover a fundamental flaw in MS Search? Is there a way to exploit this vulnerability to make millions of dollars (I am anxious to equally share in the profits with all contributors!) ?
Or is this just another example of really, REALLY,
REALLY bad software?
P.S. ... If you haven't noticed by now, I'm really good at finding bugs ... if you dare to call your software "bug-free" (or at least, bug-repellent), then you should at least hire me as a consultant!
That was only semi-serious, as MS products have more bugs than we (humans) have fingers to point with! (But I am truly gifted at finding bugs, and well worth the investment.)
Going off-topic... WAY off-topic... is there any way to market my skills at crashing code? Thanks for any/all feedback in this area!!